|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist ought to have his head examined." (Samuel Goldwyn, Hollywood movie producer) |
assenger stops should be where the passengers are! The vehicles should come to the travelers; the travelers should not be required to move along in stairways, escalators and elevators, nor walk along endless corridors, to get to where the vehicles are. Since our urban areas are built in such a manner that people usually travel on the ground (i.e. along the streets) to get from one point to another, thatīs where most stops should be.Nor should a beam conveyance system make a larger encroachment into existing environments than necessary. Thus, passenger platforms should not be up in the air, where they oftentimes throw their shadows on the neighborhood, and, rightly, are considered "unsightly". |
1. Independent stops; Terminology. |
![]() |
|---|
Let's first define our terminology:
On a reasonably extensive beam network, there could be 3 kinds of traffic:
The first category, and often even category 3) will be needing stations. |
These stations should as much as possible be placed on the ground. The FLYWAY concept does not require platforms. The passenger cabins would be even more accessible from the ground than today's roadbuses, since the cabins do not require the large wheelhouses that the roadbuses have. Placing stops on the ground would provide for:
The cars could lower themselves as they slow down at the stops, thus saving time. Entries and exit beams to the stops will have to be long enough to enable the beam cars to adjust their speeds to the one prevailing on the through-beam, or breaking when leaving the main artery, similar to the entry and exit ramps to the freeways for motorcars. |
![]() |
If we first look at stations, we find that they can have different combinations of attributes, depending on what is required in each case. Thus, we have:
|
In this illustration, the traffic moves from left to right. Thru-traffic keeps going on the main (topmost) beam, while stopping cars enter any suitable sidetrack.
|
n figure 2:2 above one can imagine different tracks being used for different purposes, as well as having the passenger cars using different berths according to their destinations, in the same manner as bus terminals function. The traffic moves from left to right, with thru-traffic using the topmost beam in the figure. Some beams can for instance be used for loading/unloading of motorcars and/or freight, requiring beam cars that can twist their loads sideways. Such beamcars would allow, for instance, loading of motor cars from the sides.
|
![]() Figure 3:1 |
|---|
|
Crossings between different routes are natural places for stops. If the beam-crossing takes the shape of a roundabout, it takes some planning to get a good arrangement of stops. Figure 3:1 shows a crossing which is not a complete roundabout. The stops have been put close to one another (indicated by the red beams marked "S"). The drawbacks are 2: The beam cars have no possibilities to turn left, and the stops are in 2 levels, which might be perceived as a drawback for som passengers. Figure 3:2 shows a real roundabout with stops for all travel directions (the red beams indicated by "S"). Now we have solved one of the problems above. |
![]() Figure 3:2 |
|---|
|
But we can do better!
For the price of increased complexity, we can make a roundabout in 2 planes,
One problem that could occur is that the stopping cars would be in each other's way.
This could be solved by yet another roundabout, concentric with the first one, but with smaller or larger diameter.
These roundabouts are connected to each other with beams at about 45 degrees angle, as illustrated in figure 6. The cars could then use these angled beams as berths, |
![]()
|
|---|
The beam-carried traffic must have closest possible access to other kinds of traffic. This means:
|
With a beam above a railway platform as in figure 4:2, it will be very easy for passengers to switch transportation. With a beam along a sidewalk, one can easily switch between a taxicab and a beam car (figure 4:1). There is something missing, though, in figures 7 and 8. What is needed is some safety device that ensure that the cabins donīt land on top of people or on other gears. This has been provided for in the FlyWay® system! For airports, beam traffic could really be a boon to comfort and speed. There is nothing stopping beams to be mounted inside the arrival and departure halls, only a few steps from the checkin counters or the passport control, respectively. For interior flights, one could have beams in tunnels under the tarmac right up to the waiting aircrafts (figure 9). |
![]() Figure 4:1 |
|---|
![]() Figure 4:2 |
|---|
![]() Figure 4:3 |
![]() Figure 4:4 |
![]() Figure 4:5 |
|---|
he smoothness of the beam system makes it possible to have traffic indoors, in places such as shopping malls, department stores and the like. One can even but beams in the ceilings of apartment houses and hotels. That would make it quite convenient for tenants, but the main reason for doing this would be if adjoining, parallel streets were too narrow or crowded to harbor beams. |
![]() Figure 5:1 |
|---|
igure 5:1 shows a birds-eye view of what it could be like. Suppose that all streets between numbers 2 and 9 inclusive have to kept free from beams, for one reason or another, then one could travel upwards from the seashore street between streets 3 and 4, as shown in the picture (let's hope that the people living in those houses are heavy sleepers!). In the crossing street labeled A
| one has decided that the beam traffic should go at street level (maybe the reason is that the beams would be in the way of some planted trees otherwise). This makes it on the other hand possible to have beam-crossings in separate planes, such as in the streets 1 and 3. Regarding those houses between streets 3 and 4; what could be more convenient than taking the elevator in the house where you live, to the floor where a hired taxicab is waiting to take you out on the town. | And better still, when you arrive home late at night and don't have to walk those dark streets in the rain?! The entrance holes in the walls open and close automatically; they are never open except when a car is passing through. They could be fenced-off on the inside to prevent accidents, and thus become as safe as an elevator. |
lazas, squares and open places close to other transportation sites, such as railway stations, should have beamcar stations with many parallel berths. But trying to fit this solution into an ordinary street might be awkward, as can be seen in figure 6:1. A one-way station with parallel beams would occupy the whole width of a 4-lane street. The best solution for inner-city streets would probably be to have 2 beams for each direction. For narrow streets with one-way beam traffic, this would mean 2 beams in total. For 2-way traffic we would have 4 beams, as shown in the illustration at right (figure 6:2, where the yellow rectangles indicate stops of the kind briefly described further down; the chapter about safety). There should be many small stops instead of a few bigger stations, they should be as close together as is practicable, and each stop should have its own entry and exit. The reasons for this are:
|
![]() Figure 6:2 |
|---|
Sloping beams are needed in 4 situations:
|
How steep can beams slope? |

he idea of having stops at streetlevel has been further developed in figure 7:2. A reserved beam for stopping (green) runs at streetlevel along the street, parallel to the beam for through traffic (black) higher up. At reasonably even intervals, the lower beam is accessed by descending beams (blue) and the upper beam by ascending beams (red). |

s we said in the beginning of this web-page, one could (and should) use this transportation
facility to haul freight of all kinds, preferably at times with low traffic flow, such as during the night. Industries, warehouses and stores are but a few of all those who could have great use of this service.
A typical indoor terminus for this traffic could well use several floors in a big building, as illustrated in figure 8:1.If a beam-carried transport network of this kind is implemented on a big scale, there would be a need for several thousand cars. To conserve space, the garages and parking areas for those cars, should preferably be in several floors like this. |
![]() Figure 8:1 |
|---|
| Copyright Đ 2004, SwedeTrack System. | Last Updated: 2007-01-17 |
Webmaster |
This site is maintained by Johnson Consulting |
|---|