|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first fully automatic flight is due to take off. At start, the on-board loudspeaker announces: "This flight is fully automatic. We have no crew. Just push a button for take-off. Push another button to get a meal. Push a third button to land. Nothing can go wrong - click - nothing can go wrong - click - nothing can go wrong ..." |
![]()
![]() |
Airtravel is unrivalled when it comes to long-distance travel. And for shorter trips; if you have your own piper cub and pilotīs licence, you probably wonīt be interested in travelling much with commuter transports. But for the rest of us, there is a breaking point when relatively short trips by air are more comfortably made on the ground. If that ground transport could be made swifter and with more comfort, that breaking point would cover progressively longer distances. |
![]() |
|---|
Deciding upon the Breaking Point
hat is this "breaking point" we are talking about? It is roughly the distance that answers the question "how far away does a destination have to be in order for me to go by air, rather than travel on the ground? In deciding on the answer, one has to consider these drawbacks with regular air flights:
Fuel typically amounts to about 25% of operating costs of airlines.
The Worldīs 15 Largest Airlines
It is well worth noting that these figures apply to the time before September 11th, 2001. Since that event has led to longer check-in times because of stiffer security at airports, it has become more tedious to fly. |
|
t should be pretty clear, then, that if ground-based travel alternatives gets improved in regards to speed and comfort, this would be a real boon to air travel as well. If air travel loses passengers to ground transportation on some shorter routes, some airports would be less busy, there would be fewer flights, and it would be a let-up in this development towards waits for time slots and long holding patterns when landing.Have you ever watched the night sky over Las Vegasī Airport on a friday night? You can behold a long, illuminated ribbon of aircrafts awaiting their turn to land. A beautiful sight, but very costly for airline operators and very time-consuming for passengers!
![]() And air traffic is growing rapidly. The Worldīs airlines are expected to purchase about 16,000 new aircraft between the years 2000 and 2020, at a cost of US$ 1200 billion, altogether. Considering that some aircrafts will be discarded because of old age, there would still be a growth of about 700 new aircrafts in the sky every year. 2 more aircrafts every day! And the aircraft industry will spend another US$ 350 billion on increased aviation infrastructure. Thatīs an awful lot of money! Air traffic is no small threat to the environment, as well. Exhaust fumes released at those altitudes where inter-continental flights travel might well influence the hothouse effect. Options to reduce climate impact include:
Itīs rather interesting to note that both regular air travel and FLYWAY® use the timeslot system to coordinate traffic. Only, beam systems on the ground can do so much more efficiently. Why is that? Well, the obvious reason is that aircrafts need so much space on all sides, for safety reasons. Also, they are confined to travel corridors, because they travel between airports, and these corridors cannot handle more traffic than can be handled by the airports at each end. In year 2002, the permitted vertical distance between aircrafts in Western European flight corridors will be reduced from 600 meters to 300 m. But airlines are actually trading timeslots between them; they are worth a lot of money!
The Real Challenge; MagLev!
![]() Using MagLev, velocities of up to 500 kilometers per hour will be possible. Speeds over 400 km./hour, using ordinary trains, have already been tested in Japan. Using an independent maglev transit system with stations about 300 kilometers apart would give the airlines stiff competition for trips to the nearer airports and to locations within a 1000 km range. With such automatic MagLev cars going to destinations without airports, such a system would just take over; no checking in one-hour before departure, no reservations, no schedules or unsavory weather conditions to impede traffic.
|
|---|
| Copyright Đ 2004, SwedeTrack System. | Last Updated: 2008-04-26 |
Webmaster |
This site is maintained by Johnson Consulting |
|---|