|
|
|
|
|
|
| Always borrow money from pessimists -- they don't expect to get it back. |
|
Electrically powered road vehicles are seen as a partial solution to the commuting problem in the city. It does not alleviate the traffic congestion, but it does tackle the problems of noise, pollution and inefficient use of gas. Electrical vehicles, using today's state-of-the-art batteries, still cannot travel very far, as compared to gasoline-propelled cars. Nor can they travel as fast nor accelerate as quick as drivers of ordinary cars are accustomed to. (Actually, electrical cars can be made to accelerate faster than combustion-engine cars, but that would deplete the battery too quickly. Trolley-buses, which did not have to conserve energy, were known for their ability to get ahead of other traffic as soon as traffic lights at intersections switched to green.)
![]() Figure 1: An early electrical car; |
The inconvenience is largerly a psychological one. The driver of an electric car has to keep a closer watch on the milage left before it's time for reloading the battery, than the driver of an ordinary motorcar has to check his gas meter. Getting stuck in the middle of nowhere with a flat battery is not an appealing thought.
![]() Figure 2But the beam traffic system could come to the aid of the electrical vehicle, rather than being a competitior! Let the long and quick transports in urban areas be handled by the beam traffic system. Using a new type of batteries, electrical cars could be transported on beamcars resembling flatcars, and have their batteries recharged from the beams during transport. The car would most of the time only have to travel in the areas where the owner lives and where he has his job or other destination. The long-haul transports in-between these localities could be handled by the beam system. The use of electrical cars would thus be more attractive, as their action radius could be greatly enhanced. The presence of the beam network would make it possible to use cars with smaller batteries, which would ease the load on the engine (by making the car lighter) and also make the car cheaper. |
![]() |
These 2 illustrations below show what we mean. A family living at A would need a car with an action radius shown by the circle in the illustration at left, to get to their various destinations without replacing or recharging the battery on the way. The car would reach the places of work (at C and D respectively) and, by recharging the battery, the car would also reach home again at the end of day. Yet, this family does not reach their summer vacation site (depicted by B).![]() Figure 3 |
But if they live in a city with a fairly extensive beam network, as shown by the blue lines in the right illustration, they could use a car having only the action radius corresponding to the largest of the depicted circles, which each indicate the distance between a destination and the nearest beam traffic station. If the beam network has a line to a neighboring city, the family could even get to their vacation site without requiring a larger battery (or a conventional motor car).
![]() Figure 4 |
Figure 5Enter the beamcarried traffic system, with FlyWay´s dual-mode service, and the picture changes radically (figure 8). You can now, without much trouble reach the whole area serviced by the beams. |
Figure 7 |
Figure 8 |
|---|
![]() |
| Copyright © 2004, SwedeTrack System. | Last Updated: 2007-01-17 |
Webmaster |
This site is maintained by Johnson Consulting |
|---|