What should be required from Our Transportation Systems?

Previous page: What is Automated Beamcarried Traffic? To Main Page To Header Page for this section Index of terms used on this site Next page: Why are Public Transport Systems Losing out to Private Cars?
"If I look confused, it's because I'm thinking." (Samuel Goldwyn, Hollywood movie producer)

Transportation Philosophy

Anfang areful research over decades has shown no flaw that will or should stop the development of PRT, but rather that PRT is a badly needed solution to a variety of transit problems. It is a new configuration of now very ordinary parts well within the current state-of-the-art." "Development of new concepts in public transportation differs from development of many other emerging concepts in that the resources needed to prove a concept are large, many people are involved in deciding to take a positive step, the level of credibility must be unusually high, and the "fear factor" that drove military programs is not present." "In such circumstances, it is not surprising that several decades have been required to bring the concept of PRT to maturity."

(J. Edward Anderson, Ph.D., P. E.)

Anfang hen the automobile became more and more common in the western world, and streets became paved, it was the beginning of real freedom of movement for many people. But the situation has long since started to degenerate. We have become too many on the roads. We desperately resort to new solutions to get from point A to point B within a reasonable time; new bridges, tunnels, highways.

Visionaries see a future where most of us have small vehicles that can travel through the air. But the airways are getting congested too, as it is now. Timeslots have become a precious commodity in Western Europe and North America.

If a commercial airliner misses its appointed time, it might have to wait on the ground for hours for the next available timeslot. And landing aircraft increasingly have to circle in "holding patterns" above airfields before they can land. Trains and ships can still make headways. But otherwise, we humans are increasingly getting in each other's way when travelling.

The other drawback is that the motorcar driver has to devote his travelling time to controlling his vehicle. This might be enjoyable when one's young, but pretty soon, as driving is experienced as more or less tedious; one would like to devote that time to other matters. Rich people, who can afford it, do indeed get themselves a chauffeur, so they can take their mind off the traffic.

Ye Olde Transportation Philosopher
"The Transportation Philosopher"


The beam traffic system tackles these two issues in an elegant manner. It uses computers and well-designed networks to ensure that cars seldom create congestions. And it does the driving for you. With the comfort of having your own chauffeur.


A vision from "Century Magazine" of 1891.
(Color added by William Godinez, Manila)

Weather Resiliency

When you think about it, not many transportation vehicles keep running under adverse weather conditions as long as the beamcarried vehicles.
  • Gale-force winds would keep aircrafts on the ground, and keep any but the biggest ships from sailing. And road vehicles get blown off the roads. But the beamcars would keep running.

  • Dense fog would bring road traffic to a halt (except in London!), but not the beamcars.

  • Flooding would stop road and rail traffic, but not beamcars.

  • Ice would stop shipping in northern waters, and heavy snow stops road traffic, railways and often aircraft (if airport landing fields cannot be kept open), but these conditions do not affect hanging beamcars.

Resilience against the Forces of Nature

Suspended traffic is immune against snow

  • Earthquakes could quickly destroy roads and bridges, making them impassable. But beams are much more quickly repaired, at least provisionally.
A transportation infrastructure based on suspended beam vehicles is more resilient than any other infrastructure. It keeps running even when nature is not at its best behavior.

Traffic Policy

The Home environment is the responsibility of families and individuals.
The Work environment is mostly the responsibility of the employers.
But the traffic environment, which we all have to negotiate on our journeys between home and workplace, is the responsibility of us all.
But who has the power to influence the traffic situation? None other than those politicians and city planners that we leave in charge of those matters. After many protests against the building of new roads, the British Labor Government in August 1997 announced measures to reduce traffic volumes in the U.K. As far as Sweden is concerned, the Government and the Parliament have indeed formulated a goal for the traffic policy. The overriding goal has here been divided into 5 parts.


"The overriding goal for the traffic policy should be to provide the citizens and the business community in various parts of the country a satisfactory, safe and environmentally sound traffic availability at the lowest possible cost to society."

"The transportation system should:
  1. be shaped in such a way that the citizens' and the business community's basic needs for transportation can be provided in a satisfactory manner.

  2. be formed in such a way that it contributes to an effective use of resources in the society as a whole.
  1. be formed in such a way that it corresponds to highest reasonable standards for safety in the traffic.

  2. be formed in such a way that a good environment and preservation of natural resourses is promoted.

  3. be constructed in such a manner, that it contributes to a regional balance."

Demands on Light-Beam Traffic

How well would a Light-Beam traffic system fulfill these goals? Let's take a look.

1. Satisfactory transports

  • 1.1 Increases the value for passengers and freight by shorter door-to-door time, simplifies accessability, provides better safety, better comfort and at a lower cost.

  • 1.2 Efficient coperation with other forms of transportation for passengers and freight.

  • 1.3 Better availability for all categories of people.

  • 1.4 Handles both very small and very large transportation needs (for instance; in the central parts of town during peak traffic hours and in the suburbs during the night), with equal efficiency and cost.

  • 1.5 Offers a competitive alternative to the road traffic, both in the compact cities of Western Europe with their high percentage of puplic transportation, and in the spread-out cities of the USA wiith their high share of private car usage, and also in the fast-growing cities of the developing world with their high share of pedestrians and bikers.

2. Effective use of resources


  • 2.1 Uses far less land, building material, labor and energy for the same amount of transportation.
  • 2.2 Reduces the transportation needs, by freeing up areas previously covered by road and parking spaces, thus enabling more compact cities to be built.
  • 2.3 Results in lower costs to the society, by reducing the use of resources, environmental costs and costs for accidents (such as hospitalization).
  • 2.4 Provides opportunities for the business community to develop, produce, export, install, operate and circulate material.

  • 2.5 Creates new high-tech employment opportunities.

3. Safe traffic

  • 3.1 Reduces considerably personal injuries in the traffic, especially in urban areas and reduces accidents at work while handling goods.

4. Provides good environment and preservation of natural resourses.

  • 4.1 Reduces the environmental pollution from the road traffic in the cities.
  • 4.2 Counteracts segregation between heavily used areas such as in the central areas and low-use areas such as the suburbs. Much of this difference is caused by the radial nature of the present public transportation networks in the urban areas.
  • 4.3 Reclaims areas from the motor vehicles for use by pedestrians, bikers, parks, etc., and enables the creation of central parts in every city completely free from motor vehicles.
  • 4.4 Minimizes the physical impact on the cities by its very unobtrusive nature, compared to other means of transportation.
  • 4.5 Can also handle transportation of cars, in order to unload the roads at certain spots. This also eases the introduction of electrical cars, by indirectly providing accesses to places to reload batteries.
  • 4.6 Reduces pressures on the environment (damage to forests, etc.).

5. Regional balance.

To top of Page
  • 5.1 In the long run, provides the requirements for decentralizing urban regions by providing fast and convenient transportation.
  • 5.2 Can also contribute to better regional balance.

Copyright © 2004, SwedeTrack System.
Last Updated: 2007-01-17
This site is maintained by Johnson Consulting